Do OECD global forums on agriculture help developing nations in trade?
Agriculture
plays a vital role in domestic and international policies of many countries. In
fact, developing countries have lower education, poor health care, and lack of
technologies, but they have highly diverse in natural resources, populations,
cultures and economic policies, which they can compete with developed nations
on cheap labors. Also, their exporting focus on primary products such as
agricultural goods, raw materials, fuels, and textile. These products are
important to the world’s poor because they represent more than half of low
income nations’ export.
Although many of these governments have intervened in
many different ways in domestic and international markets to support
agriculture, the agriculture sector contributed to national incomes and
employment in advanced countries. Moreover, these governments contributed to a
reduction in economic efficiency, damage to the environment, distortion in
production, and trade barriers. It can lead to financial cost that are borne by
consumers and taxpayers. It’s a reason why OECD global forums on agriculture
invited all the developed and developing economies to share experiences and
explore how policies can more effectively achieve stated government objectives.
Also, the purpose of the OECD is supporting and protecting mechanisms and
regulations.
In
my view, it is not sure that OECD global forums on agriculture can help the
developing countries in trade, because subsidies of government in OECD
countries (advanced nations) provide to the agricultural producers still remain
high, approximately $227 billion (EUR 172 billion) in 2010.
On the other hand,
emerging economies such as China, Russia, and Brazil have much lower levels of
support to agriculture. Not only these three countries, but also east Asian countries
such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and South Korea. It’s difficult
for them to trade because many people will spend their money on manufactured
goods rather than spending on primary goods. For example, falling 70 percent
price of agriculture commodities is sold by developing nations. Therefore,
it is not fair for developing nations to compete in trade which they should
have comparative advantage.
No comments:
Post a Comment